Also, the way Shan spoke to his mother shows that he sees her as just that (weak and helpless). He argues with her and does not look to her for advice nor appear to respect her opinion. He clearly thinks he knows better than she. (And in all honesty, I think he does know better than her.) In the first chapter he doesn't ask her permission to go to the courtyard, but instead simply declares his plan. When she states that she does not think his plan is wise, he argues with her, then doesn't even wait for her to change her mind and agree with him. He just simply argues and then acts on his own decision."Shan, I'm glad to find you here," she said. "I was afraid you had gone with your father."..... "I heard them speak of a wounded knight." ....."Shan, what does it mean? Is someone making war on us? Are there enemy soldiers outside?"
"Don't be afraid, Mother," said Shan.
When she tells him he cannot go to Camelot (at first) he technically obeys her, yes. Yet not because he respects her, but because he believes he is obligated to obey her. This is obvious in the way he asks her the same question every day until she says yes. On the other hand, I'm not sure the mother had good reason for saying no in the first place and, in the end, she does not say yes because she has been persuaded to agree that it is a good idea, but because she "can see that [he] will never be happy until [he goes]." Which is just another way in which the mother is poorly portrayed."Mother, I'm going down there," he said.
"I don't think you should go," said Lady Marian.
"No one is fighting," he said. "There's nothing to be afraid of."
He put on his clothes. He ran down the stairs and into the courtyard.
So although I think the root problem lies in the way the mother is written, it then forces the boy to role model an attitude which is inappropriate for most children (those with competent mothers). I appreciate that this was the attitude toward women during the era in which the story takes place, but that doesn't mean strong female characters didn't exist and/or couldn't have been written. Especially considering this is a fictional children's book.
The reason I chose to read this book first of all the ones we'd selected for my son is because I was most excited by it. I felt the topic would be the most appealing to my son. Yet we're already dealing with issues of my son believing he knows better than his parents. The last thing I need is to hand him a book that reinforces the idea that he's smarter than me or his dad. Obviously I don't act the way the mother in this story does, but I'm not sure I trust a 6 year old to discern the difference. I'm afraid all he'll see is a boy who acts like he knows better than his mother and is successful because of it. I know that the task of selecting books for these reader sets is a monumental one. And I certainly appreciate the effort that must have gone into putting them together. I am just so saddened and confused that a book which portrays mothers in such a poor light is included.