Rod & Staff vs. CLE LA

This is where new posts begin. All questions or discussions about any of Heart of Dakota's curriculums start here. If you wish to share a one-time post about your family's experience with our curriculum, you may post under the specific curriculum title (found beneath this "Main Board" heading).
Post Reply
momofgreatones
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 9:00 pm

Rod & Staff vs. CLE LA

Post by momofgreatones »

We recently began using CLE LA before we started with HOD. I think I have heard that the two are similar, but I'm not sure. Can someone give me insight/a comparison between the two? If R & S is truly better, then I would consider switching, however switching in itself can be detrimental and I want to avoid it if there isn't a significant difference... My poor children are scarred from switching... :?

Thanks!

Monique
Monique

dd 18 graduated!
dd 16 studying for CLEPs
dd 14 Studying for CLEPs
ds 12 CTC with extensions
ds 10 Bigger Hearts
dd 8 Bigger Hearts
dd 4 Little Hands to Heaven
dd 2 Little Hands to Heaven
Top
mamanlait
Posts: 259
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:01 pm

Re: Rod & Staff vs. CLE LA

Post by mamanlait »

I have reviewed CLE 3 and thought it looked really strong. I would say R & S 3 is more concise and is (obviously) non-consumable. It's shorter to get through each day. Also, handwriting is not included in R & S which was an upside for us because we really liked our handwriting book but something to consider. I imagine they are fairly similar in Scope & Sequence. If you like it I would be inclined to stick with what works! I think you are wise to avoid a lot of switching. I regret those moments of fear and the needless switching I've done in the past.

Amy
Currently:
dd 16 AH1 -bits & pieces (previously used Bigger, Preparing, CtC, RtR, Rev, MMtM, WG, WH)
dd 12 REV (previously used LHTH, LHfHG, Beyond, Bigger, Preparing, CtC, & RtR)
Top
annaz
Posts: 833
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 12:47 pm

Re: Rod & Staff vs. CLE LA

Post by annaz »

In addition, R&S is mastery and CLE is spiral. Both are good programs. It's whatever works best for your child.
Married 1994
One DD 6/2000
One DH :)
One cat
One dog
Three horses :shock:
Top
NicoleJ
Posts: 155
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 1:46 am

Re: Rod & Staff vs. CLE LA

Post by NicoleJ »

I did CLE last year for year 1, and now am using R&S Gr 2 for LA (with Bigger). I am enjoying the R&S one better (which suprised me!) but we are skipping a lot - there seems to be a lot of irrelevent material and a lot of going over the same old stuff. However, when we used CLE, I skipped HEAPS and it was worse than R&S. I have considered changing R&S to Queen LL, but I think R&S will be ok for us, as long as I skip what we need to. ATM, we are using about 1/4 of the lesson, and skipping every two or so lessons.
Top
my3sons
Posts: 10702
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 7:08 pm
Location: South Dakota

Re: Rod & Staff vs. CLE LA

Post by my3sons »

I haven't used both, but I here's a link to why we enjoy R & S, in case that's of some use:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4077&p=30147&hilit= ... ion#p30147

In Christ,
Julie
Enjoyed LHTH to USII
Currently using USI
Wife to Rich for 28 years
Mother to 3 sons, ages 23, 20, and 16
Sister to Carrie
Top
Carrie
Site Admin
Posts: 8128
Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2007 8:39 pm

Re: Rod & Staff vs. CLE LA

Post by Carrie »

Monique,

This past discussion may be of some help to you. If you don't have time to read the whole thread, you may want to read my two responses on the thread in order to get a feel for why we recommend what we do for English instruction. Link: viewtopic.php?f=6&t=3963

It may help as you ponder. Just a thought. :D

Blessings,
Carrie
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Main Board”