I’ve been discussing HOD with an interested friend and a couple of concerned family members who are more used to traditional methods. They all asked about the use of living books and the emphasis on history. I’ve read a bit about living books and answered from what I’ve read (and from my experience so far), but it didn’t quite reassure them. Since my kids are so young, they question whether the HOD method will be an advantage over more traditional methods in the long run.
The questions go something like this:

Why so much history before high school? Multiple history books, history projects, history activities, history notebooking, even history books in science. In traditional methods, history is often just a part of SS. Students can still get a decent understanding of history and science from textbooks (or even just one interesting book—like story of the world) and they can experience science with experiments. So what is the advantage of the extra time spent on history (using it in both history and science and adding fiction books, lots of biographies, etc)? How does it help them in life to have such a deep understanding of what it was like to live back then and to know so much information about the lives of historical people…even great people? We can study other cultures that exist today and we can study great men and women that live today, we can even study an overview of great people and times in history…what is the advantage of more/deeper history?
And why do it with living books? Seems like a lot more information than is needed in upper elementary/middle school. (they understand the importance of reading some good books, but more for literature than for history/science…and not as many of them in each grade nor as many books at the same time).
So, would some of you be able to share how the extra emphasis on history and the use of living books has benefitted your family? I’d like to be able to answer them well…and be ready in the future. (besides, all their doubts are rubbing off on me a bit… eek!
