I think it's important for dc to go through at least 1 year of a formal handwriting program to learn how to properly form the letters. I too, like pp, like the way HOD plans for this.
After that, I think it is important that handwriting is legible, spaced well, and fairly neat. It's actually more important to me that words have spaces between them, and letters are about at the same height, etc. than it is that dc write "perfect" letters. You can see what I'm talking about at this post I did a few years back...
Pics of hi-lighting Riley’s lines for HW:
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=4618&p=34014
I also think it's important for dc to go through at least 1 year of a formal cursive handwriting program, again to learn how to properly form and also connect the letters. I like the way HOD plans for this too.
I think it is good not to expect dc to write everything in cursive after the year of learning it. Keeping up their manuscript, as well as practicing their cursive, will help them know which is more their natural bent. HOD plans for this as well. Then, after a few years of practicing some of both, dc are really old enough to be able to choose which is their preference. At this point, they know which they do better with, and so do we.
Boys especially, will not often choose cursive. Do you know many adult men who write in cursive? I don't.
However, it is actually more important IMO that they are able to read cursive writing, and lots of varieties of cursive writing, as no one writes perfectly or the same. That is why I love HOD's "Cheerful Cursive". It has dc reading many different styles of cursive writing (once they've learned the "proper" way). It also has them look at manuscript, and write underneath it in cursive, and vice versa. This is an important skill to learn, as dc will be asked to do this for copywork (books are written in manuscript, yet dc will have to do some copywork, notebooking, etc. from them in cursive from time to time).
I think we have to be careful not to get hung up on perfect handwriting. It can begin to frustrate dc so that instead of them thinking about the ideas they want share in their writing, they're thinking about how they can write the shortest possible amount so they can make a perfect "P" or whatever letters they are writing. We can miss their ideas by expecting perfection in handwriting. However, on the flip side, we will totally miss their ideas (and everyone else will too
), if we can't read their writing at all.
I do think that it's important not to allow a joining of the 2, so dc are within one sentence, writing some letters/words in print, and some in cursive. This just is kind of a confusing mess to try to read.
Pick one or the other, and stick with it for an assignment. Then, the next assignment if they want to pick another, that's just fine, but mish-mashing the two, IMO is a no-no. HTH!
In Christ,
Julie