Thank you for your thoughtful response here, Carrie!
The time you take to explain HOD's vision for things is much appreciated. I know of no other author that is such an active part of his/her message board, and certainly it is rare to find an author that will take the time to explain his/her decisions in such detail. I love that you care so much to do this!
I will also concur that my ds has done very well with science on his standardized testing too, and he has only ever done HOD's science. However, the thinking he is able to do is more important to me than the scores. He loves science, and the "scientific method" plays itself out in real world problems for him to solve all of the time (i.e. the day he fashioned a ramp to move the wood pile from location to the next after experimenting with many methods to see which one would be the fastest
, or the way he uses what he's learned about plants in our garden, etc.).
While I respect that many families do enjoy using Apologia science for high school and know it works well for them, I personally do not see myself using it with my dc. I have looked at it again and again quite extensively, and I can see why it seems overwhelming to many dc as well as to their homeschool parents. In fact, I would go one step further to say that worrying about doing science in high school can sometimes be a primary reason parents put their dc in ps. I know several students who have made it all the way through Apologia high school science, even attending the labs for it within a co-op, who scored very poorly in science on their college ACT's/SAT's. Is Apologia to blame for this? I do not think so. It is a good program in its own right. But, those dc likely did not have a God-given talent for understanding science, or if they did it didn't show up during their high school years of science.
Apologia could not change that. I believe that teaching dc to think scientifically is so important, as all dc can learn this to some degree, and that kind of thinking is beneficial for all. Plus, when taking the ACT's/SAT's, if one does not know the answer based on memory alone, having scientific reasoning in place will help them think through how to find the answer better and arrive at the best answer. But, I do believe that science minded students will do well with Apologia science, whether they did HOD's science beforehand or another science beforehand.
I have found nothing seems to put true thinking about one's learning into motion more than CM's use of living books, accompanied with her visionary LA style responses to those books, through oral and written narration. Her hands-on type of approach to science as well is something I feel we do so well with HOD, because every single week my dc do an experiment (and in the younger guides it is twice weekly). I have looked at the amount of reading, defining, written work, and the labs in Apologia and felt I may not truly get them done consistently and correctly. Even if we did get all of it done consistently, I think it may take so much time in the school day that the other subjects could suffer. I have felt pressure to do Apologia science for high school, but I am content with the route we are going. More and more, I have come to believe in CM's style of educating, and that goes for science too. At first glance, CM's methods seem simple, but once I've done them, I realize they are a deep well of difficulty, and they are teaching my dc to think for themselves at a very high functioning level of comprehension. Thanks for explaining here, Carrie! We are excited to do have the option to do HOD's science for as long as you are writing.
In Christ,
Julie