CLE Reading vs CM type narration/dictation
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:02 pm
We use CLE Language Arts and Reading. DD loves basal readers (go figure) and I love the critical thinking skills, vs just comprehension skills other reading programs have. They also contain great character training. CLE also uses diacritical marks (for dictionary pronunciations), how to study, proofread, all these skills that are taken for granted, that, at least when I was in school assumed everyone knew (which I didn't).
I'd continue with CLE LA, because that's what we're using. But I see all these skills that CLE has for Reading and don't understand how narration covers them all, nor all the phonics, rules, symbols for spelling. I also read some thoughts about narration, that when their child got to high school, there was trouble. So this makes me wonder how can narration be enough, and dication for spelling; learning by seeing and usage, other than learning rule based.
I'm not questioning what's being used, but I'm not convinced yet. If I compare CLE Reading to narration, is it that the CM style doesn't believe all the phonetics and symbols aren't useful? I just feel like there's a lot missing doing it this way. Am I missing something?
The reason I ask is that I love CLE and what it teaches in Reading, however, I feel stuck. If we put it aside to read a living book, we're perpetually behind CLE. For instance, we can't take a a few days off to read a living book because we'll always play catch-up. If we don't work on our seatwork for reading, you can't just skip over, because it all builds on itself. And yes...that means perpetually behind.
How can I be convinced that reading living books covers the critical skills needed and the basic knowledge of skills like:
Analogies, scanning, proofreading how to; root words, prefixes, suffixes, rules for spelling, dictionary symbols, figures of speech, synonyms, antonyms, making logical suppositions, compound words, fact/fiction, predictions, cause/effect, …I could go on.
Are these things in DITHOR? Or maybe covered in R&S English?
I'd continue with CLE LA, because that's what we're using. But I see all these skills that CLE has for Reading and don't understand how narration covers them all, nor all the phonics, rules, symbols for spelling. I also read some thoughts about narration, that when their child got to high school, there was trouble. So this makes me wonder how can narration be enough, and dication for spelling; learning by seeing and usage, other than learning rule based.
I'm not questioning what's being used, but I'm not convinced yet. If I compare CLE Reading to narration, is it that the CM style doesn't believe all the phonetics and symbols aren't useful? I just feel like there's a lot missing doing it this way. Am I missing something?
The reason I ask is that I love CLE and what it teaches in Reading, however, I feel stuck. If we put it aside to read a living book, we're perpetually behind CLE. For instance, we can't take a a few days off to read a living book because we'll always play catch-up. If we don't work on our seatwork for reading, you can't just skip over, because it all builds on itself. And yes...that means perpetually behind.
How can I be convinced that reading living books covers the critical skills needed and the basic knowledge of skills like:
Analogies, scanning, proofreading how to; root words, prefixes, suffixes, rules for spelling, dictionary symbols, figures of speech, synonyms, antonyms, making logical suppositions, compound words, fact/fiction, predictions, cause/effect, …I could go on.
Are these things in DITHOR? Or maybe covered in R&S English?