Resurrection to Reformation question - MOH
Posted: Thu Mar 22, 2012 9:44 am
Good morning;
We've been using CTC this year with three of our boys, ages 11-14, the oldest with extensions. I want to say, this is one of the most fantastic years of homeschooling we've had thus far. I love the book choices, I love seeing the growth in my kids in so many areas, and the schedule, believe it or not, has really freed me up to include more of the CM-style elements I haven't included before. We adapt a bit to make it work for us, but overall it is a wonderful program. Thank you, Carrie!
Here is my question. In looking at RTR for next year, I was a bit confused to see Mystery of History listed as the primary resource for 21 weeks. We've used earlier versions of this series, and I found them to be decidedly un-CM: many more facts crammed in, much less of a living book feel. On a surface level, without perusing more than the online sample of that version of MOH, it seems like a departure from the lovely, living books we're experiencing this year, and that I see listed in the rest of the RTR curriculum. I'm wondering if anyone could explain this book choice, or their experience with it in light of this concern.
Thank you!
We've been using CTC this year with three of our boys, ages 11-14, the oldest with extensions. I want to say, this is one of the most fantastic years of homeschooling we've had thus far. I love the book choices, I love seeing the growth in my kids in so many areas, and the schedule, believe it or not, has really freed me up to include more of the CM-style elements I haven't included before. We adapt a bit to make it work for us, but overall it is a wonderful program. Thank you, Carrie!
Here is my question. In looking at RTR for next year, I was a bit confused to see Mystery of History listed as the primary resource for 21 weeks. We've used earlier versions of this series, and I found them to be decidedly un-CM: many more facts crammed in, much less of a living book feel. On a surface level, without perusing more than the online sample of that version of MOH, it seems like a departure from the lovely, living books we're experiencing this year, and that I see listed in the rest of the RTR curriculum. I'm wondering if anyone could explain this book choice, or their experience with it in light of this concern.
Thank you!