Carrie, thank you for your reply. I wanted to clarify my thoughts about the SL notes. I agree with you that it seems like the further up you look in the SL samples, the more opinionated the notes become. I take issue with that as well and do not want that from HOD. I also agree that SL questions are mostly comprehension questions, and that is not ideal, either. What I do find very helpful as a teacher, though, is having background information on the book -- tidbits about the setting, when it was written, why it was written, any vocabulary that is unique to the book, pictures of some of those unique items, that sort of thing. I understand about turning children to the bible and other sources for answers and I think that is wise. What I see as an issue for me is that I am supposed to do that independent work on my own as well. It would be helpful if the teacher were equipped with that information as much as possible. Reading comprehension is difficult for me and I feel like I need help so I can help my child. I don't want it to be left entirely up to me to understand what it is that is being read and what it is my child is supposed to get from the reading. Sometimes the work that is done in HOD is generic to the books chosen, and that is what I am talking about as far as wanting book-specific help. I realize your time is very limited and this is something that may not be possible right now. I just wanted to put in a request for consideration down the road.Carrie wrote:As we look at other companies who have gone before us, we desire to take a different path from what is already offered. While I hesitate to mention much in the way of comparison to other companies, since the Sonlight teacher's notes where mentioned earlier in the thread as one ideal, I will share that from our years with Sonlight I found the teacher's notes to include mainly comprehension level questions and word definitions and to be quite opinionated as to the views of the author in the summaries and notes. This meant that I was having to add my own higher level thinking questions and sift through quite a bit of information, with which I often didn't agree, to decide what to share with my child. We desire to stay away from both of those scenarios in our HOD guides as much as possible. Our goals focus on turning children toward God's Word or back toward a variety of textual sources in search of answers. We desire for the kiddos to do the sifting and sorting through the information rather than having the parent be the purveyor of information. In philosophy, we seek a more Charlotte Mason style education, with more thinking and discussing and fewer prescribed answers. I do realize that there is a time for "set" answers and for checking comprehension, and we do both in our guides. However, I also believe that the best preparation for engaging in meaningful dialogue with a child is to spend time with the materials the child is using rather than spending time reading my summaries of the material. With a Charlotte Mason style education of fewer books of a higher quality, it is more manageable to keep on top of a child's readings.
I know not all parents have time to read their kiddos books, yet it is surprising how much you can pick up just through listening to your kiddos' oral narrations, reading their written narrations, reading your kiddos' notebook entries, talking through the questions in the guide about primary source documents or poetry or Bible passages, etc. The guides from CTC - MTMM have much information contained within the teaching in the boxes that goes far beyond the key idea. Our goal at those levels is to teach you how to facilitate learning and to guide your child in learning to think. This is process that goes beyond one right answer and is one you as the parent will discover as you move through our middle guides.
Thanks,
Kathy