Thank you both for your replies.
After re-reading my original post, I am afraid it may come across in a way that I did not intend. So.....
Please let me assure you that I am in no way considering Singapore Math may not be so great. Entirely the opposite. I have had many, many days when I kick myself for not using Singapore with my oldest (who is now in pre-algebra). I had seen singapore when she was in K, and came very close to using it. But since she was my first child, and I was not a teacher, and yada-yada (all that stuff new homeschool moms think
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
), I was afraid to use it because it was so non-traditional. But over the years, of course, I developed more confidence, and then decided I didn't care much about what was traditional, and just wanted what was best for my kiddos
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
.
Oldest was too far in to math at that time to make a change, but my others have all started out with Singapore (well, they didn't actually start with it, but when we switched over to it, they were going into 2nd and 3rd grades, and we began with 1A to fill in the gaps). I have seen a
tremendous difference in the way my younger kids understand math. My oldest can "do all the steps", because that's what she's been taught. But the difference is, that when my oldest comes to something new, she needs to learn a new set of steps, because she doesn't have the understanding that my youngers do. The youngers can look at things they have never seen before (within reason of course
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
), and solve it a good portion of the time because if they understand A and B, then C is not that great of a leap. And this is with All of my Singapore kids (not just the two I am asking about now), so I don't think it has to do with whether they are mathy or not (one of them I would consider "mathy", the others are mostly average
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
). Singapore, in my opinion, produces a much better grasp of the way math "works".
Ok, sorry to get so off track....I just wouldn't want anyone to read negativity towards Singapore in my original post. Now, back to topic...
I know that they understand. I believe they even know the
procedure. I think the problem comes in the area of
communication. Does that make sense? They could communicate the procedures they use when we were doing most everything until recently. I think I just started noticing it when they were doing fractions. And the main reason I noticed, is because they were showing off by "helping" their big sister
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
. They corrected her, but couldn't explain to her how they knew the answer. So then I started paying a little more attention and asking them, "how did you get your answer?" more often. They just have a very difficult time communicating that to me. So now after typing that out, I am wondering if this is similar to when kids are beginning oral narrations. You know they know they material, but they just can't seem to form their thoughts very well. Could that maybe be the same case here? If so, maybe if I just ask a few leading questions, and work up to a full explanation, by the time they get to algebra and up, they will have developed the art of "narrating" their math procedure.
![Idea :idea:](./images/smilies/icon_idea.gif)
Am I way off here? Would love some thoughts on this
Ang